Biased Analysts

Overall, this article talks of how news corporations across the nation have been using biased information from invalid sources. Men and women alike who claim to be political and military analyists are sometimes hoaxers. People on the political spectrum are looking to agree with their chosen sides, whether it be right or left, so they want to hear the news that appeals to them. Fox News, and CNN are big time political talk shows, where information is skewed from time to time. Today, there are so many skewed news programs, which we find to be both informing and entertaining, when they happen to be untrue.


In the below video clip, Bill Cowan, a recognized analyst starts to rant of how only one side of a particular story would be covered by the Pentagon, and other sources. As soon as Bill starts to give his input on a topic, the new reporter immediately cuts him off, and end his interview. The reporter knew Bill's outburst would lead to valid points, so he had to get him off of the air. This goes to show how even station reporters coincide with this political unstability, so to speak.

Next, a Democrat was edited on Fox News, to make it seem as if he was a drug user. In the given video, focus in particular on 1:09 through 1:15. By doing this, it made him lose voters, although he was up against nobody in the upcoming November election.

In addition, a brand today's news article from Russia and Libya, tell us that the pictures we have been receiving of so called, "air strikes," are actually incorrect. Russian military sattelites have been examining the areas in which were reported to have been hit, on February 22nd. These locations, including Benghazi and Tripoli are free of Libyan weapons of war. Our news has been giving us invalid information for the past 8 days or so. In doing so, it has caused a bit of an uproar for both Libyans, as well as Russians.


http://www.infowars.com/russian-military-claims-libya-air-strikes-did-not-happen/


Finally, this political cartoon shows how the Executive powers exclude congress from their business. It seems as though Congress has the peeping Tom look going for them, whereas the executives are smart, and secluded. The fact that Congress has to pry into other political outposts, shows how instability is a possible outcome.